I'm beginning to think the majority of the Supreme Court is just senile. Last week, the liberals, with the help of Kennedy, demolished our Constitutional property rights. And today the liberals, with the help of O'Conner, further marginalized God. Their ruling on the display of the 10 Commandments solved nothing. It will only spark a firestorm of litigation from sea to shining sea. If I understand the ruling correctly, to determine whether the 10 Commandments can be displayed on public property, first the Thought Police must be called in to investigate whether the intent of the display is religious or historical. The Commandments can stay if they're displayed with other things, such as the Declaration of Independence, examples of Anglo-Saxon law, Norman law, Laws of William the Conquerer, the Lone Ranger's Creed, etc. OK. So, if the 10 Commandments down at the local court house is being threatened by a small group of whiny weasels, all you have to do is erect some other monuments to balance it out, right? Wrong. You see, as part of their investigation of intent, the Thought Police will look at when those other symbols were added. If added later and not at the same time the Commandments were erected, everything has to go. It's unclear whether you can take everything down and then put it all up later, but I'm thinking the Thought Police would frown on that. Oh, and for some odd reason, the monuments must be displayed in a large, open area, not a closed-in space. Do some of those justices have claustrophobia? At any rate, this is the last we'll hear from the Senile Supremes until October 3rd, unless one or more of them resign or drop dead. I should start an office pool. THEN you're going to see a battle that will look like the last episode of Buffy the Vampire Slayer. Liberals cannot push through their agenda at the voting booth. So they MUST force their twisted ideas down our throats through the courts. They've been doing it since the days of FDR, when he stacked the Supreme Court -- including sneaking in a former KKK member -- to pass his socialist agenda, which even he knew was unconstitutional. About 97% of Americans claim to be Christian, Jewish or Muslim. The 10 Commandments are a part of each of those religions. Even Muslims are taught (or are supposed to be taught) to follow them. Yet, a tiny majority of bigoted weasels want nothing to do with God. Well, let's see what would happen if they got their way. Once again, this isn't rocket surgery, but apparently it's too deep for the left to understand. All you have to do to figure out what a totally secular society would look like is to look at some. The perfect examples are Communist and former Communist states. Without exception, their number one problem is corruption. The problem with atheism or secularism is it has no moral benchmarks. Certain things are forbidden, not because they're considered immoral, but because they're against the law. And who determines what's right and wrong? Politicians and judges. And before you know it, things are being banned not because God thinks they're wrong but because politicians and judges think they're wrong. And if you thought the vengeful God of the Old Testament was strict, you ain't seen nuthin. Pretty soon it's illegal to own a gun, to smoke in bars, to drive without a seatbelt, to have too much water in your toilet tank, etc., etc., etc.. You gotta wonder what those politicians and judges will do when they've banned every single human activity. Will they repeal some laws just so they can pass them again? It is no coincidence that the most secular nations on earth are also the most repressive. The problem with a society that is based on secular rather than moral laws is that people who don't want to obey a law just won't. After all, it's not as though God will punish you if you break the law, the politicians will -- if they catch you -- and if they themselves aren't corrupt beyond salvation. And every lawbreaker knows that he'll never be caught. You've heard it time after time from the left when the government tries to pass legislation aimed at curbing immoral behavior -- "You can't legislate morality!" That's not only wrong, it's stupid. Is murder immoral? Do we have laws against murder? Is rape immoral? Do we have laws against rape? Is theft immoral? Do we have laws against theft? Obviously the government CAN legislate morality. What the government cannot do is INSTILL morality through legislation. Morality MUST be instilled through social mores. Then it is codified into law. If those social mores break down, the government can pass all the legislation it wants and it will not halt the breakdown of society. Then it will hold its sham of a society together through brute force. Look at places like Burma and North Korea. And what is the left in this country doing? They are breaking down the very institutions that provide us with a moral compass. They are conducting a jihad against religions. The ACLU and NAMBLA are working jowl to jowl to knock down age of consent laws in every state. ANY attempt to bring the discussion of social mores into the public arena is met with howls of protest. And what has this brought us? Generation after generation of increasingly amoral monsters. "Doctors" who get rich aborting babies, mothers who kill their children, children who kill their parents, grade school kids who rape and assault. It is no longer sufficient to watch your children at play and hold their hand in the mall. Child molesters now break into homes and kill entire families to get at their prey. The future of this country is clear as crystal to everyone but the knuckle-headed liberals. With the destruction of moral institutions, the government will have to pass more and more laws to control society. The more laws that are passed the more laws that are broken. But that will suit the leftists. It's how they prefer to live.
No comments:
Post a Comment