Thursday, September 04, 2008

Mad Dogs and Liberals

A British paper -- for once -- gets the Sarah Palin story exactly right.
There are few sights more bloodcurdling than the liberal pack in full cry. The viciousness of the attacks on Sarah Palin is a testimony to the degree of panic her appointment has generated in Leftist circles.
It would seem that it is only sexist to trash a woman candidate if she is a Woman Candidate, which is to say a liberal.

8 comments:

Tonto said...

Anybody worried that Obama has raised 8 million since hse Palin was named VP nominee?

Hoping you will make me feel better.

tugboatcapn said...

Well, the National Organization of Ugly Angry Lesbians declared her a "man" today, so I guess in their eyes, she's fair game...

The Left hates Sarah Palin to pieces because she IS everything that they claim to have wanted for women for forty years, and she became who and what she is without them, in spite of them, and in their face.

And they know that they cannot beat a ticket with someone like her on it.

So no attack is too low, no subject off limits, no politica; trick or personal attack too dirty.

I hope she sticks to her guns... (pun intended...)

Lone Ranger said...

McCain raised 10 million at the same time. No worries.

Trader Rick said...

We're standing behind this small town nobody no matter what!

Stand up and fight for America!

Tonto said...

Thaanks LR. Good news!

Yeah Trader Rick that last five to ten minutes of his speech will be the excerpts they teach in Speech Class in High schools.

I learned the "Checkers" Speech and "I have a Dream" Speech and McCain made me cry with his last ten minutes and I have heard his POW story a 100 times and I still cried.

Cindy McCain's life and good looks reminds me of Princess DI.

Mark said...

Also, according to the national Association of Ugly Women, it would seem that a woman has a right to choose as long as they choose to kill their babies. Bristol Palin's choice to keep hers apparently isn't the right choice.

Maybe I don't understand the Lib definition of the word, "Choice".

Tonto said...

I believe you LR but HuffingtonPost is saying only 1 million. Wonder how they are saying that?

You know I never knew HPost to be this mean ever. Or I guess I am just really sensitive about this topic.

Lone Ranger said...

They probably took the numbers soon after the speech. By the way, more people watched the RNC than the DNC. There is definitely interest in the election with the addition of Sarah.