What is this country coming to?
ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. (AP) -- A high school principal could be in trouble for taking one of his students to a barber shop -- without permission of the pupil's parents. "Students should not be taken off of campus by any staff member without parental permission," said Rigo Chavez, district spokesman. Rio Grande High School Principal Al Sanchez said he thought Fidel Maldonado Jr.'s hair style -- the number "505" and a Zia symbol shaved into the back of his head -- was a gang haircut. Sanchez said he thought he was doing Maldonado, 15, a favor by taking him to a barber instead of suspending him. "I said, 'Do you want to just go to the barber and cut it off?' He said, 'Yeah.' I said, 'Let's go,"' Sanchez said. Fidel Maldonado Sr. said the law was broken when the principal took his son off campus. He said he is considering legal action. "For him to take my son and take him out of school without my consent, against his own will, is wrong," the elder Maldonado said.In New Mexico, a minor can have an abortion without notifying the parents. Once again, the will of the people was thwarted when a judge overturned a parental consent law that was passed by the legislature.
2 comments:
Wait. A child can get an abortion without her parents permission, even knowledge, but a child can't be given a haircut without permission?
And why would his father object to getting gang signs removed unless he is a gang banger himself?
Instead of prosecuting the principal, they should be arresting the father for neglecting his little gangster.
Well Mark and LR that's easy if he were a she...he would get over an abortion with or without Dad's permission...so no need for Dad to know...but teachers cannot go around giving kids BAD HAIRCUTS...it may grow out in two weeks but the psychological damage to junior is a lifetime...just something parents will not stand for.
Due to the fact that the some of the best and worst supreme court decisions have involved allowing the law to work...then someone like the ACLU....taking the situation and turning it into a case...I am now waiting for the case where a parent who had a child get an abortion and find out about it after the fact, sue the the abortion givers and all parties who didn't disclose to the parents...the arguments for notification would be so compelling we woudln't be voting on it anymore. But it would be a reverse situation and makes the argument stronger...like playing on your home court...rather than hearing about the poor girl who had to tell her mean old dad.
The argument I hear against it is...these kids don't have good parents that should be told they are having an abortion...they could be thrown out of the house for being pregnant. Funny I have never heard that actually happening at least for the reason of getting and abortion or being pregnant.
So that is the compelling argument...you will take the right of average parents who this will predominately affect.
If we keep adding fundamental rights into the Constitution "the right to parent" should be up there with the "right to privacy"...with all the other crap they have added.
RIGHT TO PARENTING should be equal and unfettered as the RIGHT TO DE-PARENT. and if your kid is just 16 then your right to parent overrides your child's not yet fully formed rights.
Honestly if common sense were required like the rule about balancing the budget...government would have to shut down.
Post a Comment