The Washington Post has finally admitted something conservatives have known all along -- the Valerie Plame leak case was NOT a vast right-wing conspiracy. And, surprisingly, they admit it -- without ever mentioning they were leading the mob of screaming, torch-bearing villagers who wanted to burn down the White House and salt the ground. And they were so intent not to cause any more pain to the Bush Administration that they kindly printed their admission on page A-20.
WE'RE RELUCTANT to return to the subject of former CIA employee Valerie Plame because of our oft-stated belief that far too much attention and debate in Washington has been devoted to her story and that of her husband, former ambassador Joseph C. Wilson IV, over the past three years. But all those who have opined on this affair ought to take note of the not-so-surprising disclosure that the primary source of the newspaper column in which Ms. Plame's cover as an agent was purportedly blown in 2003 was former deputy secretary of state Richard L. Armitage.
Mr. Armitage was one of the Bush administration officials who supported the invasion of Iraq only reluctantly. He was a political rival of the White House and Pentagon officials who championed the war and whom Mr. Wilson accused of twisting intelligence about Iraq and then plotting to destroy him. Unaware that Ms. Plame's identity was classified information, Mr. Armitage reportedly passed it along to columnist Robert D. Novak "in an offhand manner, virtually as gossip," according to a story this week by the Post's R. Jeffrey.
The last graf of the story would be laughable if it weren't so sickeningly hypocritical.
Nevertheless, it now appears that the person most responsible for the end of Ms. Plame's CIA career is Mr. Wilson. Mr. Wilson chose to go public with an explosive charge, claiming -- falsely, as it turned out -- that he had debunked reports of Iraqi uranium-shopping in Niger and that his report had circulated to senior administration officials. He ought to have expected that both those officials and journalists such as Mr. Novak would ask why a retired ambassador would have been sent on such a mission and that the answer would point to his wife. He diverted responsibility from himself and his false charges by claiming that President Bush's closest aides had engaged in an illegal conspiracy. It's unfortunate that so many people took him seriously.
Nobody took this story more seriously than the liberal press -- with the Post at the forefront.
2 comments:
Lame, indeed. You're the first conservative blogger I seen even touch this story. What's wrong with the people on our side of the aisle?
Michelle Malkin got to it a few hours after I did. I guess it was hard to find -- buried so far inside the paper.
I know someone who works at the Newseum. Maybe I should clip it and give it to him to hang there as an example of irresponsible reporting. Naaa, waste of a perfectly sharp pair of scissors.
Post a Comment