Well, well, well, Rep John Murtha is being sued for defamation by one of the Marines he called a cold-blooded murderer.
A Marine Corps staff sergeant who led the squad accused of killing two dozen civilians in Haditha, Iraq, will file a lawsuit today in federal court in Washington claiming that Rep. John P. Murtha (D-Pa.) defamed him when the congressman made public comments about the incident earlier this year.Attorneys for Frank D. Wuterich, 26, argue in court papers that Murtha tarnished the Marine's reputation by telling news organizations in May that the Marine unit cracked after a roadside bomb killed one of its members and that the troops "killed innocent civilians in cold blood." Murtha also said repeatedly that the incident was covered up.
I have mixed emotions about this. What Murtha has done to these Marines is defamation. It is also shameless, self-serving and totally without honor. He has convicted the Marines involved in the Haditha investigation before they have even been charged with anything. Their reputations are forever tarnished.
But, as much as I'd like to run to my sock drawer and find something to shove in this former hero's mouth, this cuts both ways. We all wish irresponsible politicians (Democrats) would just shut up and go home. But lawsuits against politicians are used as a political weapon in some parts of the world. This is a favorite tactic of some strongmen in Asia. In Malaysia or Singapore, for instance, opposition politicians have found themselves bankrupted if they even expressed their opinion. It's one thing to say, "I think Howard Dean is nuts." It is quite another to say, "Howard Dean is certifiably nuts." The distinction disappears in some of these Asian lawsuits.
So, although I sympathize with the Marine who is being slandered, we all know how low liberals can sink. If this lawsuit is successful and becomes precedent, the left will certainly use it to their advantage.
2 comments:
Well the law is written here that you can say anything as long as you disguise it as (1) "an opinion" or (2) whatever you are syaing better be true. These are the only two defenses against generally against defamation.
So if what you say happens with this lawsuit then the only way around it in the future to prevent censorship of comments is for all politicians to just say [and this is also for anyone else for that matter] is...begin each sentence with "in my opinion..."
as long as you say that regardless of whether or not it is true you are o.k.
You can't say something that you know is false and sell it as true and hurt the reputation of someone else UNLESS it just your opinion...so remember that and your attorney will have no problem defending you...for example you hate your boss well then say..."in my opinion my boss is scum and is cheating on his wife and lies on his reports." You are in the clear.
sorry for the typos on my last comment...hard to feed a baby and type a comment...no time to proofread too!
Post a Comment