Tuesday, December 27, 2005

Ewww Canada

MONTREAL (Reuters) - On a recent night out on the town, Michel and Chantal Delbecchi left their suburban Montreal home and drove to the L'Orage Club in the city's east end, where they had sex with a couple they had never met before.

The Delbecchis, husband and wife since 1978, are "echangistes," French for "swingers," who for the past 21 years have been visiting clubs like L'Orage (Thunderstorm) to have consensual sex in a group with one or more other people.

Have you been following this story? It seems that sex clubs are now legal in Canada. No Canadian voted for it. It was never debated in Parliament or by the Jedi Council or whatever passes for government up there (I don't understand or follow Canadian politics). last week, ONE judge decided there was no reason he could think of that such acts should be criminal, so he ruled them legal. Just like we, Canadians could save a lot of money by just firing their entire government and employing a single judge (or a married judge, if he likes to go to swinger clubs) to pass and enforce all their laws. Think it couldn't happen here? It already has. Some years ago, one liberal judge in California ruled that sex for money is not illegal if it is done in front of a camera. No Californian voted for it, the California legislature didn't debate it, this one judge just wanted to preserve California's very profitable porn industry.
As for Michel and Chantal, a 25-year-old woman has become their mutual lover and all three plan to move in together early next year. Despite that new relationship, the Delbecchis expect to continue exchanging sex partners in Quebec clubs. Said Michel: "At the club, we have sex with people. At home, we make love."
Awwww, isn't that sweet? This is why we need conservatives at every level of government, especially in the judiciary.

4 comments:

Lone Ranger said...

Liberal socialist, conservative socialist, it just befuddles me.

Anonymous said...

i really don't see what is wrong with having the judge rule that the club is legal. for one, i personally don't see a problem with having it legal. secondly, it seems as though they were in a grey area, so, someone got something done without having to go through a lot of beaurocracy. now, if people are that disturbed by it, they can go ahead and make a law against it if they want.

Lone Ranger said...

There were already laws against it or the clubs would not have been raided in the first place. The people already made laws against it. This one judge overruled them all. He appointed himself dictator of Canada.

Lone Ranger said...

Is it wrong to rape? Are there laws against rape? Is it wrong to steal? Are there laws against stealing? Is it wrong to murder? Are there laws against murder? So, obviously you CAN legislate morality. What you cannot do is INSTILL morality through legislation. That is the job of society. No panel of bluenosed old men sat down 2,000 years ago and drew up a list of things that were sinful. The rules of society evolved over hundreds or thousands of years to curtail behavior that results in consequences that are harmful to society. Those rules were then taught by churches, schools and parents to each generation. And in cases where those rules were disobeyed, they were made into laws. But that process is breaking down. The rules are being dismissed by people who can't see anything wrong with "concenting adults" doing whatever they want to do. What have been the consequences of 40 years of free love and recreational sex? Disease, death, the breakdown of the family unit, the abortion of millions of unwanted babies, more millions of babies in the foster system, the general breakdown of the innocent society we used to be. People are either not learning from their parents or they are dishonoring them by rejecting their childhood teachings. I don't want courts having to tell us the difference between right and wrong. Participating in a sex club should be as socially unacceptable as picking your nose in a five-star restaurant. But because of the unbridled passions and selfishness of a MINORITY of people in our world, we can't depend on society to furnish us with guidelines anymore. And so we continue to slide down the slippery slope of immorality toward barbarism.